I think subsection 94(5) might be problematic, actually. It's about “continuing services”.
Basically, your government wants to make it clear that using replacement workers is prohibited. I understand that it's an agreement you've defended together, but you added that there might be continuing services under certain conditions, as stated in subsection 94(5):
94(5) "If, before the day on which notice to bargain collectively was given, an employer or person acting on behalf of an employer was using the services of a person referred to in paragraph (4)(b)…
It says that replacement workers cannot be used. But if they're hired prior to the notice to bargain, replacements can be used. It amounts to giving an employer who wants to declare a lockout all the tools needed to get around the act.