The short answer is no. I think the critique of the federal government's homelessness approach that was put forward by the Auditor General is probably the most comprehensive.
I would say there are a couple of challenges. They said they wanted to reduce chronic homelessness by 50%. The question is 50% of what? I'm not sure they have a good baseline. They have point-in-time counts, but in my mind, that isn't the most accurate approach, but they are good for what they are.
The other thing that I think is important is the federal government's Reaching Home is a program; it's not a strategy. The challenge the Auditor General highlighted, which I think is accurate, is that the government's homelessness goal wasn't matched with their housing plan. If homelessness is a housing problem, your housing strategy has to reflect your homelessness objective. I don't believe that to be the case at this point.