Thank you very much. So there's still a good unionization rate. It's relatively stable, but obviously that depends on the reference period.
I'd like to ask you another question. As I said, the unionization rate is a huge determining factor. That goes without saying. But what can we use here in this analysis? I'm not asking you to tell us exactly what we should do, because I know that's not your role. On the other hand, playing with numbers makes me think that you probably draw some conclusions.
How are we, as parliamentarians, in a position to further encourage unionization? For example, Bill C-58, regarding strikebreakers, has been passed. Can you think of other things that might be in our blind spot as elected officials that we could work on, without saying whether we should? I understand your position, but could you shed some light on this?