You may be referring to the actions of Minister Steven Guilbeault to shut down the INEOS facility instead of addressing emissions reduction, which is a technology that was available and could be put in place.
Let's move on to the next question.
Part of compensation for good union jobs is benefits. The government is considering introducing what it calls a universal single-payer pharmacare system. That would mean that everyone would lose the payment system they have now. Most union payment plans—I used to be on the Local 663 one—cover 15,000 medications and other services, whereas the public plans tend to cover only 4,500. Would you be in favour of giving up those hard-fought-for union benefits if the government goes ahead with its plan?