Sure.
The majority of the projects that we have delivered to date—let's say 80% of our projects—have been supportive housing projects. These projects require government funding in order to go forward. Let's see.... Yes, 80% of those projects have been funded through the government's rapid housing initiative. Clearly, none of those projects would have gone ahead without funding.
I know that there is talk about the rapid housing initiative being expensive, and there is some consideration on changing it or abolishing it. I think it's the single most effective program in place for developing the kinds of housing that we have been doing so far, and I think it would be a huge mistake to eliminate it. If you do decide to eliminate it, then you need to replace it with other programs that are going to contribute the funding that's necessary to build the kind of housing that we've been doing previously.
Certainly, when these programs are funded and we know we have revenue streams to be able to build buildings of this type, it encourages us to continue to invest in our form of construction. We're building a brand new plant immediately adjacent to the current plant, and we're doing that because now the affordable housing work we do represents about 30% of all of our work. If you abolish programs that limit our ability to do those kinds of projects, then it's going to discourage continuous investment on our part.