I mentioned in my opening statement that in the building code, one thing that could be focused on is performance-based codes rather than prescriptive codes.
For instance, at a certain scale of building, you fall into either combustible or non-combustible construction, which immediately kind of precludes you from considering mass timber. You have to climb a bit of a hill to actually prove that you are as good if not safer than concrete, whereas, if you were able to just demonstrate from the beginning the safety criteria, the fire resistance, the durability and the concerns of the building code, which is the concern that's at the heart—the performance criteria—then that actually shifts the conversation. It does not actually delay the process in having to prove something that you are not, but rather prove what you are.
I think that is actually a fundamental shift in how we evaluate buildings.