I think there are some really good things that are happening right now in the availability of funding for parts of the sector. I know that the consultants rely heavily on the SR and ED—the scientific research and experimental development program—to help with the self-education that's happening. Without that, the process would be much slower.
I think that, if we were just talking about funding and not a study, demonstration funding makes a big difference for developers who are considering using a new technology because it helps take the edge off the risk, knowing that there's going to be some buffer that might offset the incremental cost for them. Currently, demonstration funding is occasional. It's not reliable, and if there were just a permanent pool of money available to allow for these innovations to take place—and, obviously, through a vetting process and with certain criteria—having that would make it more permanent and predictable. Right now, when these funding programs happen, they happen for just a very short period of time, but the life cycle of a building, from the time that somebody thinks of the building until it's completed, is years. The current programs, if they happen to be timed correctly for that project, they'll get it, and that's just too much of a risk for most building developers to consider.