Thank you, Mr. Armstrong. I have another question.
Many housing observers are saying that, generally speaking, we should rather provide money to non-profit organizations, which would be in a better position to ensure housing affordability over the long term.
Unfortunately, in the case of programs such as the national housing co-investment fund and the rental construction financing initiative, after a while, the housing is often no longer as affordable as it was in the beginning. However, the rapid housing initiative, RHI, is a worthwhile program that covers 100% of the housing cost and ensures affordability over the long term.
Do you think we should spend money on that kind of a program rather than on the new program announced in the latest budget?