The issue I was focusing on there was that housing need has those three categories. Is the unit big enough or suitable? Is it in good enough condition? Is it affordable? Of those folks in core housing need, 92% have only an affordability problem. They're living in a house that's adequate and suitable. Actually, taking the Canada housing benefit, for example, expanding it, and increasing the level of assistance to more households, for all those folks who are paying too much of their limited income for rent we could be giving them some help with the rent. We don't need to build them new housing. We could actually help them where they currently are.
I think we haven't traditionally in this country utilized those types of demand-side subsidies. The Canada housing benefit edges into that, but I think it's grossly underfunded relative to the level of need. We need about $4 billion a year rather than $4 billion over 10 years to really address housing affordability issues for existing renters, leaving aside any building.