I can answer your first question, but you will have to repeat the second one.
For the time being, the elements presented in the bill concern tripartism and chairmanship.
I will digress. People were wondering earlier why it took so long to introduce this bill. There is an impression that the government is operating in a vacuum and is not talking to stakeholders who use that appeal system.
Right now, MASSE is noting that many improvements have been made to the Social Security Tribunal of Canada, SST. Those improvements should be integrated into the mandate of the new Employment Insurance Board of Appeal. One of the things I'm thinking of are all the outreach activities to make information more accessible to the unemployed, the form the SST uses to communicate with the unemployed and the calls it makes to them to give them information. Despite all those improvements, when we read the current bill, we feel that there is an intention to start from scratch. But that seems out of touch with the reality on the ground, as improvements made by the SST and the possibilities provided by the board of referees should actually be combined.
There you have it. I know that this does not answer your question.