Thank you, Madame Chabot.
We are in a time situation, too. It would be my desire that the letter be very general with what we heard from witnesses. Once we get into editing, it's only fair that the committee would have the chance to review what would be written in it. If we're going to take the testimony of some of the witnesses, then that becomes a time process.
The letter will simply indicate that the committee heard from witnesses on the various sections and that the recommendations the committee chose to forward to finance are attached. We could include the clarification for those members you indicated that the committee anticipates that division 32 would be dealt with in detail on its own.
Seeing no further discussion, does the committee want to move on consensus?
I see consensus on the only motion that's currently before the committee from Madame Chabot, on the key part. I see thumbs up.
Ms. Zarrillo, you have your hand up. Everyone else has their thumb up.