I have one last question.
It has to do with the program, which will end in March 2024, so in two years. We asked the witnesses we heard from, who represented three of the intermediary groups, how they saw things going forward. I realize that it's up to the government to decide what happens next with programs. However, it seemed important for the intermediary groups to be involved in reviewing the program and any progress being made.
Is this part of the mechanism you want to put in place through the intermediary groups? At least that's what I'm calling them; I hope I'm using the right term.