Rescinding it would be a new direction for the committee. The question was whether or not the subamendment came after Mr. Long's amendment. If Mr. Long's amendment was first and we voted on it, which we did, then I don't know how we go backwards—only to vote on rescinding the actual motion. But at this point right now, I would suggest that the subamendment is completely out of order.
Is that correct, Mr. Chair?