When I say it's modelled after GIS, the most important aspect of that is the supplemental income nature of the GIS. It's not income replacement.
Of course, the GIS is its own type of benefit and doesn't need to interact in such a complex way with existing PT benefits. If you look at the OAS portion in our model, it is being delivered by the PT. On the GIS side, OAS is a federal benefit, so it's interacting with another federal benefit. It's not interacting with established, complex PT benefit systems.
If you look at.... I can't even think of another example. It's fundamentally modelled after the GIS in the sense that it will be a supplemental income.