I guess, to tag on to that, if there was a lot of learning during that time and a lot of consultation, why would the legislation be exactly the same? You would think there would have been things that were learned, that would have come up, and you would be saying, “Okay, this makes sense to put this in the legislation.”
The legislation is very.... You used the term “framework”, but it's really vague in many ways, and it doesn't give a lot of comfort to people in terms of knowing what might be coming down in the regulation.
During all of that learning, why weren't there even minor amendments made as you moved forward with this legislation?