Thank you, Mr. Chair.
As Mr. Morrice pointed out, some witnesses said that the benefit should apply to the individual. We understood the thinking behind that. It's a question of autonomy and the status of disabled people, and this would ensure that they would receive this support.
I wanted to ask a more technical question, about whether it was net income or gross income, but it's not important.
On the other hand, there are other points of view, and it's true that it's sometimes better for it to be on the basis of family income.
Which is most beneficial to the disabled person? That's who we want to help.
Am I prepared to say that the best arrangement is on the basis of the individual's income? There are arguments for that, but would it not be a better idea to pursue this discussion if we want to comply with a part of the principle stated in the “nothing without us” strategy?