I think the devil is in the details, as they usually are in these things. I think this is a big move. It is a big move not just for employees. On the day we announced it, I said that this was an absolutely seminal day for workers in this country. It is something that for decades they have been asking for: a ban on replacement workers. Having said that, we also have to make sure that we take into account employers and the effect it will have on them, and that's very important.
One of the reasons I obviously support this move is that it will keep people at the table. It will keep parties at the table. They will not be distracted by anything else that is happening outside. Replacement workers and their usage can leave long-lasting effects on employee-employer relationships within a company—very long-lasting—and I want people focused at the table. We have had incredible success. I wish I could take the credit for it, but it is the officials within my department who know how to mitigate and conciliate. We have a success rate in the 90% range in making sure that we come to an agreement with parties without there being work stoppages.
The tone of that table, of all parties believing they have a neutral body here in our government that will attempt to mitigate these disputes, is absolutely essential. I need to make sure that I have the trust of all parties on board.
We stand by our commitment, though, and our commitment is to make sure the legislation is introduced by the end of this year.