In the way it is interpreted, however, it's not putting those who are most vulnerable, in terms of needing the affordability, out front. I just wanted to ask that.
On slides 5, 6 and 15 you have stated that the bill is inclusive no matter where they live, yet on slide 6 it states that it is primarily targeted at not-for-profit public family-based child care. As we know, Canada is a geographically huge country. Many rural parts do not even have centre-based child care. How are you reconciling that it's inclusive no matter where they live, but you're primarily working for “not-for-profit/public/family-based child care”?