It also continues here:
—which they would suggest that the committee consider during the clause-by-clause study of the Bill; and the committee begin clause-by-clause consideration of the Bill on April 18, 2023.
Why is losing two meetings...? This was the reasoning brought forth on the floor. They said that we had the President of the United States visit, so we lost two meetings in our regular committee. I'm not understanding how that would mean that moving the deadline sooner rather than later makes any sense. There's no logic there. I'm just confused about that as well.
To go back to what my NDP colleagues said, and as I've been saying repeatedly, why are we rushing a lot of what we need to do to make it right?
That would be my question. It just doesn't seem to make any sense why we would move a deadline sooner or what the difference would be. Originally, as I believe it was proposed—and if I could confirm with you—it was supposed to be the 13th.
Is April 13 correct, Clerk?