Thank you for the question.
I would add that, from a poverty perspective, children below the age of six consistently have higher rates of child poverty. Oftentimes it's related to the mother's inability to earn an income and the high cost and lack of availability of infant child care, so starting with targeting children zero to five is really important.
I agree with Mr. Smith that it has to then extend out to older kids and middle-year children, where we are finding a gap in services—who also have significant educational and developmental needs—for kids living in poverty.
On the diversity question, I would just add that there's a difference between diversity, inclusion and equity. We need to be striving for equity and inclusion. In our submission, we've put very clear amendments to clause 7 on that.