For a reason different from that of Madam Saks, I think it's good that indigenous people and official language minorities are mentioned. I think that's very positive.
I do agree with “including”, however, just because, for example, children with disabilities are a very specific group with very specific educational needs. I just worry that it would exclude groups with specific needs in education.
I support the subamendment of “including”. I like what's been offered up by the Conservative Party in terms of a suggestion with the change of “including”, but for different reasons.