I sort of agree with Madame Chabot. I think we're jumping the gun here a bit on this one.
The government has committed to coming up with a plan. Let it come up with a plan. Also, at times I don't know how efficient we are compared to other committees, but we have a little under an hour here left. We've introduced a pile of motions and a pile of studies. Either we should commit to getting the subcommittee for prioritization moving forward, or we should try to solve that right here and now in the next few minutes. I know we have to put this one to rest, but I just don't see how this study on what the government's planning to do, when we don't know what the plan is, is a higher priority than are all of these other motions. If we get there, so be it.
I'm not trying to be alarmist or anything like that. We are in a minority government. I don't know if the clerk can calculate the total number of meetings we've already committed to, but I think we'll be pretty busy now for darned near the next year. As for anything, we as a committee have to have the flexibility, since there will be a lot of stuff coming out of the ministers' meetings and other prioritized issues. I have faith in our health experts and our food experts and really in our provincial jurisdictions as well with regard to how our kids are getting fed. I know I try to feed my daughter to the best of my abilities, and I fully acknowledge Ms. Ferrada's points about those who are challenged from a poverty standpoint, etc.
I'll leave my points at that, Mr. Chair, but I think we should just try to come up with a prioritization here for the remainder of today's meeting.