My understanding is that it was because that was redundant in the clause that it was put in. It was already implied, and that's why it didn't move forward as such. It was repetitive.
On May 30th, 2023. See this statement in context.
On May 30th, 2023. See this statement in context.
Liberal
Karina Gould Liberal Burlington, ON
My understanding is that it was because that was redundant in the clause that it was put in. It was already implied, and that's why it didn't move forward as such. It was repetitive.
See context to find out what was said next.