Thank you, Mr. Pomeroy.
As you know, our major concern is to see how we can establish a strategy on affordable housing. This is the case in Quebec and in the other provinces. Don’t you think that the definition of “affordable housing” should be reviewed?
In earlier testimony, we heard about the 30% figure. It seems that this notion of 30% varies from region to region. The right to affordable housing means that people shouldn’t have to spend more than 30% of their income on housing. I’m in a riding where people probably have to spend considerably more than 30% of their disposable income on housing.
In your opinion, should we tighten up the 30% criteria, so we have a consistent application and a clear understanding of what’s on offer?