I do, yes.
Usually if an idea is put on the table like this, it would come with attached ideas: Canada is in a housing crisis, and therefore X, Y and Z should happen.
I mentioned to my colleague today that I was disappointed to see that the Conservatives had put half measures on the table when it comes to their approach to waiving the GST. As you know, Mr. Chair, it is not an across-the-board waiver for purpose-built rentals. There's a very important asterisk, so to speak, that would prevent housing from being built. Some housing would be built, but not nearly as much.
I wonder if my colleagues had a chance to review the testimony at the finance committee that was made available a few days ago. The blues are there. Finance officials made it clear that the Conservative approach on this particular issue would not lead to very much housing, certainly not in comparison to what the government has done. This is, as you know, a much broader waiver with respect to the GST, which will see purpose-built rental apartments constructed across the country. In fact, Dream Unlimited, a very large developer in Toronto, has said that they will now, as a result of this specific measure, construct more than 5,000 units.
Where are the ideas? If we're just going to report to the House a statement, I'm wondering if my colleague is trying to find ways to eat time from the House of Commons and distract from the legislative agenda of the government. Is that the overall intent of the motion here? We know that Canada has this particular issue in front of it, which I agree is a crisis. Then what exactly is the approach?