Thanks, Mr. Chair, and through you to Mr. Roberts.
Mr. Roberts, I want to talk about labour stability for a minute. We heard from Mr. Frenette and Ms. Lane about the incredible pace in terms of what AI is doing to the workforce. Changes that used to happen in decades are now happening in a couple of years. We're all interested in labour stability to ensure that there is no disruption to the economy and people continue to work.
I watched with interest what happened with the Hollywood writers' strike. AI was the focus there. The UAW has had many strikes now. AI is at the heart of some of those discussions and those new agreements. In those instances, the collective bargaining agreements take care of what happens with AI in the workforce. Conversely, in California they've had a push against autonomous vehicles and autonomous trucks on the road. That was driven by the union movement, asking government to legislate those changes.
I'm wondering where we draw the line between leaving unions and employers to their own devices to sort out some of these things through collective bargaining agreements versus governments taking a proactive stand and saying, “Do you know what? We're going to step in at the front of this process. We're going to set the ground rules.”