To some extent, I might not be the best placed to speak to the specifics of this.
Ultimately, if the issue is municipalities having throughput issues and they are able to get an AI product or service from a provider that enables them to do this kind of work much more quickly, I think we should have frameworks that enable that.
As I mentioned earlier, the way in which procurement typically works is quite inflexible. There is a lot of needs definition that happens up front, and the specification tends to be very ironclad in that it doesn't change once it's been established. If you're a smaller company or if you're an innovative company that's trying to do something new, it might not look exactly like what the specs said at the beginning, but you're locked into it, even if it wasn't the best idea or the best way to approach the problem.
I think a really big piece of this, as I said to Mr. Fragiskatos, is that we have to find ways for government to become better at buying innovation, and there are a lot of different ways we can do that. CCI is going to have a report on this in the next month or two. I'd be very happy to share it with you.
I think that's very key here. The public sector has access now to a lot more tools than it used to, but the procedures it uses to get access to them have not really kept up with that. Different countries, like Finland and the U.K., have developed new procedures and offices that are tasked with doing what's called public procurement of innovation in the literature, and we are just not quite there yet.