Thank you for your question.
I'll answer in English.
What Mr. Roberts said, I think, is really applicable here. This is going to be a process that is going to be gradual and over time. I think there's going to be, as we've already seen, flare-ups around the use of AI in the workplace in various ways. I think that's healthy and productive. I think the more that happens, the more we will have broad discussions about how people's data is used in the workplace and about privacy, which was brought up earlier, and about standards of work and how productivity is measured just in the workplace, without regard to national statistics. These are all live questions, and I think many of them are for the bargaining table. Many of them are for regulation. I know the European Union's AI Act sort of has some of this built into it, defined as high-risk systems. Perhaps we'll follow suit with how we end up defining high-impact systems here.
All that is to say that I don't have hard answers. I don't think anyone does. I just think this will be a place where we're all going to have to figure it out together. If we don't, I think we will end up in a place where we're not particularly competitive with regard to AI adoption and deployment.