Mr. Chair, you don't need to hear this from me—you're a very able and respected chair—but if it were changing the motion of Ms. Falk very substantially, it would be out of order, and clearly it's not out of order, so there's that.
More to the point, however, I'm quite surprised with the response we've heard from our colleague. Here we heard from the head of Air Canada the other day in testimony that I think affected all of us. We have many constituents who have had experiences and challenges. I personally read into testimony about the challenges of one particular constituent, and Ms. Zarrillo, who brought the initial idea forward to summon Air Canada, did basically the same.
I see nothing wrong with our looking at this in a study, in three meetings no less, examining these matters and, yes, looking at what the government has done. I expect the opposition would be very willing to critique the government's progress. Let's examine that. Has the government done a good job on this file? What improvements need to be made? What I could take from Ms. Gray's comments is that the government has made such substantial progress that they don't want to examine that, that they're somehow afraid of looking at that in greater detail. That's interesting, and the Conservatives are apparently on record as saying that this morning.
Unless they wish to turn course here, which we can do, I think this is a very reasonable amendment. We can delve into the details and look at it on behalf of Canadians.