There are a couple of ways committees can make decisions. They can make decisions by motion or by understanding. If we can just identify what our understanding would be around scheduling, then we can adopt the amendment in that spirit.
I think it would make sense if the chair would endeavour to schedule these meetings in a periodic way, not so it's, say, September 29, and we're going to get extra time in the evening when we're already back here to we try to do a whole bunch, but we would try to have a couple of meetings in July, one or two meetings in August and a meeting in September.
We don't want to be too rigid about that, but if we have an understanding that we're not going to end-load this and that we're going to begin the work—I mean, I think it does make sense to try to get started sooner rather than later—and if we can agree to that in a spirit of co-operation, then I think we probably have an understanding that we can move on. Is that fair enough?