I think the question is a bit of a cross-cutting one. Workers' pension plans might involve Treasury Board, the government or the industry. I imagine that the minister's decisions carry a lot of weight in these situations as well. The government is saying that, ultimately, it is not reducing the quality of public service jobs. However, the government is starting to reduce the number of employees in the public service.
I talked earlier about the 40,000 public servants who will be laid off. There will also be cuts to benefits and pension plans. The quality of jobs is being reduced.
I think that the quality of the jobs is the responsibility of the minister and the department. That's why I wanted to hear your comments on the matter.
I could have also discussed the CX‑4 positions occupied by some correctional officers. They also carry out management work. They will see their purchasing power reduced year after year because negotiations are going to be held for certain CX‑1, CX‑2 and CX‑3 positions, but not for CX‑4 positions. Again, instead of solving the problem, the government is making cuts.
Sorry, Minister, do I have your attention? It's a bit difficult to ask a question in order to get an answer when you're not being listened to.
Do you want me to repeat my question?