Evidence of meeting #26 for Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was study.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Beech, I don't know if I'll have the floor in a future round of questions, but I want to thank you and congratulate you on your work.

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

Thank you, Ms. Larouche.

Mr. Genuis, you have five minutes.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

First of all, just parenthetically, I think members know that I have a motion on notice that asks the committee to report to the House that it opposes discrimination against students in the distribution of student grants based on the type of regulated institution where students are studying. I would like to move that motion today, but I'm not going to move it now. I think we should use Mr. Beech's time while he's here.

However, I'll ask your indulgence, Mr. Chair, that you come back to me after he's done so that I have the opportunity to move the motion. I think you know I could move it now, but I would rather not. I would rather just do it at the end.

Mr. Beech, it's important to underline again that we won't expand the bill unless we have the support of the government to do it. We hope the government will support the expansion we're proposing. We see no reason that it wouldn't want to support an expansion that also includes families dealing with the loss of a parent. Obviously, the government holds the final decision because it controls whether there's a royal recommendation. We don't want a situation in which the bill gets amended and then gets stopped because the government blocks it at that point.

The point of raising this amendment is not to say that it's the expansion or nothing. It's to say that we want to use this moment to advocate for an expansion that will cover as many families as possible.

You made the point that different families grieve differently and that different individuals grieve differently. I think that's a really important point, because in the past there has sometimes been a pressure on individuals to say that there's one way of grieving or one form that grieving takes. This is an important insight around leave and around different things that people are involved in—recognizing that it's a very individual process. I thank you for highlighting that. That's an important thing to flag in this context.

For the balance of my time, I'm going to hand it over to Mr. Bailey, who is, I think, the fifth generation in his family to be a funeral director, so he knows a lot about this subject.

I'll hand it over to you.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Burton Bailey Conservative Red Deer, AB

Thank you.

There are a few things I'd like to make note of.

Most young couples have never made funeral arrangements. No two deaths are the same. There may be similarities. It's an extremely difficult arrangement. I have arranged thousands of funerals, and I can remember every child that I've ever buried. The work this committee is doing is very important.

One of the things you mentioned was that different cultures require more time. I want to reiterate that some funerals can take up to a week to arrange. A normal funeral arrangement takes a couple of hours for a grandparent or an elderly person. When it comes to a child and getting answers from a couple who have never arranged a funeral, you can't even do it in one day. Children's funeral arrangements take a period of time. They have to take these ideas home so they can plan, and every culture is different. In some communities, as I said, it can be spread over a week.

Are you considering the timelines that it takes to arrange a funeral? Are you aware that it takes up to a month just to have the funeral process take place?

Terry Beech Liberal Burnaby North—Seymour, BC

I want to give four comments, and I'll be very fast about including an answer to that question.

Thank you to my colleague for the consideration on the motion he wants to put forward and for leaving it until the end.

I appreciate the clarification on the royal recommendation and the Conservative stance. That is truly appreciated, so thank you for that. I'll have to leave you in the hands of the parliamentary secretary and the minister for the decision, of course. That's outside of my control.

With regard to the timing, I believe the amount of funding in the index of the budget was for a minimum of eight weeks, which should be enough time for most situations and also to get organized in the worst case. I think there is adequate time there.

I have an East Indian wife. I've learned about a lot of different cultures in this job and in my own marriage. What you say about cultural differences and your obvious experience.... It's unbelievable service that you're providing to those families in those situations, and I can believe that it must weigh on you heavily. I appreciate you for that service, and I thank you for the question.

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

We're going to Madame Koutrakis for five minutes, after which the witness portion will conclude.

I will stay in the meeting to deal with Mr. Genuis's issue.

Annie Koutrakis Liberal Vimy, QC

I thank Mr. Beech for being here today and for the incredible work he has done on this bill. It's very important legislation. Hopefully we can get it done without delay.

I know you have, during your testimony, time and again, mentioned why it's important to pass it without delay. I will ask you this one more time: Why, in your opinion, is it important for the committee to stick to the bill as drafted in order to ensure that grieving parents receive support as intended and without delay?

Terry Beech Liberal Burnaby North—Seymour, BC

I think the “without delay” part is obvious, so I'm going to focus on the “as drafted” part.

I want to go back to the rarity of a royal recommendation. It is so rare that I had to go through the different offices, the House leadership and the like to talk to experts about exactly how royal recommendations happen in the first place. We're talking about them happening three times in 31 years. I was wondering whether it's on a piece of paper. Does somebody sign it? Which minister does that? Is it a prime minister? What's the balance of that? It was a real process to track that down, and something I'm still tracking down. It literally changed over various months.

I thought I had a clear path. It was off the table, and then it was back on. The fact that we got this item in the budget is key. Already having an assigned budget made this possible. I can only tell this committee about my experience dealing with multiple ministers and the Prime Minister's Office. I asked everywhere I could—including my own caucus and members opposite—for help in trying to navigate this. I found a path, and I worry about anything that will take us off that path.

As I said in my previous answer, I have no explanation. I don't think any member of Parliament could come up with a reason this has taken us 10 years to figure out and get to the point where we can actually pass it. We are literally weeks away from solving this problem, and I don't want to derail it.

Annie Koutrakis Liberal Vimy, QC

Thank you, once again, for your good work, and for appearing before the committee today.

With the time I have left, Mr. Chair, I would like to resume our debate on my national school food program motion from last week.

During our last meeting, it seemed an agreement was reached with some of my colleagues across the way to reduce the number of meetings to four, and the rest were agreeable. However, we ran out of resources. Seeing that this is an extremely valuable program that is being made permanent, I believe it deserves being studied comprehensively here at HUMA. I hope this is something we can all support as is.

I move to resume debate on my national school food program motion from last week.

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

Before we go to that, I would like to advise Mr. Beech that he can leave the meeting at this time, because we have two items that committee members have the option to put forward. We have them now, so we will not return to him as a witness for questioning.

If you wish to leave the meeting, thank you very much for your testimony.

I will hear out Ms. Koutrakis and then go to Mr. Genuis. The issue Ms. Koutrakis raised is a dilatory motion, so we need a vote on it. Just so we're clear—

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Chair, before we vote, can I ask that the meeting be suspended for two or three minutes?

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

I'm sorry, Madame Larouche. The vote is dilatory, so I must call the vote at this moment. I cannot entertain any debate until the vote is over.

We'll have a recorded vote, Clerk. The committee is voting on—

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Chair [Technical difficulty—Editor] not allowed to have a two-minute suspension.

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

Madame Larouche, order.

We have a motion. It's a dilatory motion by Madame Koutrakis to resume debate.

Caroline Desrochers Liberal Trois-Rivières, QC

[Technical difficulty—Editor] ask what we're voting on.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

We can stop the game.

Caroline Desrochers Liberal Trois-Rivières, QC

If that's what you want to continue doing, go ahead.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

It's always the other person who's the problem.

Caroline Desrochers Liberal Trois-Rivières, QC

I love when you talk in French.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Thank you.

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

Order, members.

We have a dilatory motion, which must go to a vote.

Mr. Clerk, please call for a recorded vote on the motion of Ms. Koutrakis.

(Motion agreed to: yeas 5; nays 4)

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

The motion to resume the debate has been adopted.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

On a point of order, Chair, I would like to get on the speaking list.

Also, could we distribute the current version of the motion? I'd like to know precisely what we're debating. I think we're debating an amendment to it.

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

I'm going to suspend for a moment while the clerk circulates it.

The Chair Liberal Bobby Morrissey

Committee members, we are back in session and we are still public.

Mr. Genuis.