Following up on what the chair was pursuing and Mr. Telegdi mentioned with respect to security concerns and also criminality, the argument was that if you made a distinction, there may be a problem with a charter breach and a problem of justification under part 1. This act relates to those over 18, and for that category in this particular act, I'd say from 18 years of age on they could come through an adoption. Would that argument still apply for the charter, or would that survive a charter challenge? How strong are you in that position of it not being justified under part 1, particularly for those 18 and over?
On June 19th, 2006. See this statement in context.