I'm just curious about something the previous witness mentioned with respect to the appeal process. I'd like to deal with that for the moment. You said that giving access for some citizenship applicants would create inappropriate distinction for others who do not have an appeal under some applications for citizenship within the act itself.
I appreciate that you're saying those who apply now in the normal fashion under IRPA have a trial de novo process, but what if you then create another appeal by trial de novo by amending the act? What about other provisions of the act and other applications for citizenship that would not have the appeal by trial de novo? How do you answer that question?