I guess the response would just reiterate the same point, and that is that within the citizenship context, we need to look at reducing the distinction as much as possible. That is, again, the purpose of the bill. Treating these adopted children, giving them a kind of citizenship appeal that isn't available to naturalized children, would harm that protection of the distinction. In a sense, we've got the best of both worlds, though, because we're allowing the individual to continue to choose to do the IRPA process or to apply directly for a grant of citizenship.