It captures the point I'm making. We're saying something in the context of this act that can only be effective if we deal with another act, particularly if we want the appeal to go from this body to that body that is now jurisdictionally constituted to do hearings under that act, but has nothing to do with citizenship.
In a sense, if we put this in it's like a dead-end street. You're not going anywhere because you have to expand the jurisdiction of the other body to include an appeal under this section. That's something you can't do in second reading on a bill such as this.
I'll raise another point that would need to be considered.