I know Mr. Siksay is a reasonable fellow. He's putting forward an amendment that I think is a well-intentioned amendment. The only thing I fail to understand is if this amendment.... I think Ed touched on it, but I lost some of the things he was saying because I was not clear. Maybe I can refer to the officials. Even though this may be a well-intentioned amendment, by putting this in the current bill you were telling us it's not going to make any difference in the end how you guys approach it.
What I need to understand is whether it's going to make a difference if we amend it now and just move on from this thing. Or should it be rejected because it's not going to achieve...? I think we need some clarification. I don't know if l'm making myself clear. I'm just so confused now after everything that's happened. Maybe you can give us an indication, if we do pass this amendment, can something be followed up on? From what I was hearing, I was led to understand that whether we pass it or not, in the end it's not going to make any difference to the way you approach it as officials.