There are similarities and differences, obviously, between the situation of security certificate detainees and what's happening at Guantanamo Bay. One could argue that at least the security certificate detainees have had access to some kind of legal process, as terribly flawed as it is, whereas of course many of the Guantanamo detainees have had access to nothing.
I think the similarity, though, is that both represent instances in which governments have chosen to pursue security practices that contravene a whole range of human rights obligations around detection protection, fair trial guarantees, the guarantee against torture and ill treatment, etc. That's where the similarity is.
I think it's really important to draw those connections to international examples. Where we want Canada's voice to be strong and credible in criticizing other abuses, we need to have a clean record at home.