Well, it is through a lawful process. If the RCMP has evidence, it may be evidence that they're not prepared to disclose to the public at large, but there are ways in which trials can be conducted that nonetheless ensure fairness for the individual concerned. It may mean that the public is not always going to have access to those proceedings, but that the individual and their legal team need access of a sufficient nature that they're able to mount an effective defence. It can, and it does, and it has happened in numerous trials around the world. Fairness and security trials can go hand in hand.
I think here in Canada there's an overstated exaggeration that we see on the part of the RCMP and CSIS--this is absolutely one of the prevailing things that came through the Maher Arar case--of secrecy, secrecy, secrecy for secrecy's sake. The cost of secrecy is justice.