He goes on to say that Parliament has weighed the interests at stake, those of the litigant and those of the community, and has made a choice that recognizes the right to collective security while prescribing a procedure in which a judge is endowed with the necessary independence and impartiality to decide whether disclosures of information can be made, the type of disclosure, the evidence, and so on.
Would you not agree with me that there has to be some balancing of rights in this whole issue? Or would you say there doesn't need to be a balancing provision?