I think the court, so far, has been saying that you need to protect national security interests with the least limitation on personal rights, but there would be, in certain circumstances, some limitations.
If you were to accept that there were some limitations, do you have a suggestion as to how that might be done better than the process we now have for security certificates, in terms of perhaps a friend of the court or an advocate to look at the evidence? Or are you saying let's just do away with the security certificate process as we now have it and deal with it in a fashion that is totally outside of that?