That doesn't sound as if it's the way either. I'm trying to find a way around the determination through a criminal court. Through the immigration system we certainly don't set the criminal court standard for a lot of people we refuse citizenship to in Canada. It's not the standard that's used throughout the rest of the immigration system, and yet you're suggesting that it may be the only solution for those who are covered under a security certificate. How do you balance that? Would you see more people trying to move the standard higher from just a straight refusal for immigration to Canada?
On November 9th, 2006. See this statement in context.