Thank you, Chair.
The motion does clearly say “recognizing legal marriages”, so we're not talking about civil unions. We're not talking about any other form, other than a legal marriage in those jurisdictions that perform legal marriages.
While I'm responding, I would just respond to Mr. Komarnicki's point. There already is a process in the department for dealing with the question of legal marriages. We don't need to set up a new structure. We have a process that examines legal marriage already, and that's all we're asking to happen in this case.