Thank you.
I'm sorry my question doesn't address legal aid; it addresses the big picture. The question, which I asked Mr. Guénette of the Courts Administration Service, is essentially the same question I'll ask you.
To begin with, I'm for the RAD. It's an important piece of legislation and should be implemented. However, I don't think it should be another piece that is added to the complete picture of all the recourse refused refugee claimants have access to right now. My feeling is that we have to look at the whole set of recourse, with all the meanderings involved, in terms of adding a RAD, replacing it, and sort of juxtaposing pieces together.
I know you've done a great deal of thinking about this in the past. Would you like to make a fairly detailed comment on how you see the whole set of recourse to which refused refugee claimants have access, in terms of bringing in the RAD and changing the whole dynamics of recourse?