First of all, when people are genuine United Nations refugees, we get them here as quickly as we can. I know government standards for quickness aren't the same as you might expect elsewhere, but we're working on that.
With respect to people who come to Canada and claim refugee status, the truth is that many are determined not to be refugees. In fact, I think something like 52% of privately sponsored refugee claimants turn out to not meet the definition of UN refugee. So when we tie up resources dealing with that, it means we don't have resources to help legitimate refugees and others who need assistance.
With respect to the RAD, the only thing I would say is that I understand the argument for it. I also know that we have a system today where it sometimes takes years and years before a final judgment is rendered as to whether or not somebody meets the definition of refugee. We also know that compared to other systems it's generally accepted that it's a very fair system. But I do understand the arguments for the RAD. They don't fall on deaf ears. I think it's part of a larger discussion that goes to something that Albina Guarnieri asked before, about what we can do to make the system a little bit more streamlined.