This is something I would love to make a little progress on. Right now there's a big refusal rate when private groups sponsor refugee claimants because it turns out that very often they don't meet the definition of a United Nations refugee. So I think it's a combination of things. I would love to see these groups.... And I know the conversation has begun with a lot of these groups who privately sponsor to say, we need you to be self-regulating in terms of ensuring you're not just picking family members, or try to make sure that people genuinely are, because otherwise you tie up again a lot of resources screening people who aren't necessarily going to be refugees. So the refusal rate has been way too high. It's about 52%. And therefore we only land about I think 3,500 people. I would love to see it quite a bit higher, to be honest.
But I think part of that goes, again, to encouraging groups to be--if I can say this--a bit more responsible about taking the time to screen people they propose to bring to the country. But I'm quite prepared to work with them to see if there's a way to raise the number of landings. I think it's the right thing to do. And the outcomes for people who come as privately sponsored refugees are typically much better because they're coming into a community where they already have people who care about them and want to help. So I think that's the best possible way to bring refugees to the country.