I noticed that the UNHCR's overall assessment of the agreement was that it was generally implemented by the parties according to its terms, and with regard to those terms, in accordance with international refugee law.
So when the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees was here in Canada and appeared before this committee, he indicated that they considered the United States to be a safe country, otherwise they would not have agreed to do the monitoring, and they would have said so at the very outset.
Do you disagree with the United Nations High Commissioner's view?