Well, I think you'd have to ask the ministers and the government. I could only guess that it may be some fear of a perception that we are adding another layer, where if it's not properly analyzed and described, the difficulty is there.
I think if it is explained that, first of all, there's a lot at stake and it can correct human errors, and, second, it could be and was intended to be configured in a way that would in a sense streamline the process and relieve the Federal Court of a great deal of its workload, it's only a question of explaining it to anyone who objects, whether it be the public or a think tank that happens to object.
It seems to me that it makes perfect sense on all levels.