That's exactly what we are saying. The refugee appeal division should streamline the process, because—we said it once or twice before—by eliminating afterwards the stay to the Federal Court, it would reduce the incentive to apply to Federal Court and streamline the Federal Court's caseload quite a bit.
As you mentioned, I think there has been a great deal of progress at the IRB. Again, going back to what we said to Mr. Alghabra, we have, in many senses, an excellent system, one to be proud of, and it's a question of building on those strengths and seeing where the gaps are now--as you mentioned, the appeal division, the PRRA.
By the way, this may be unnecessarily technical, but the PRRA didn't exist in 1999. It was something else called the PDRCCC, as you may remember. In fairness, one of the positive features of the PRRA was that with the so-called PDRCCC you had to apply for it within 15 days—I think it was 15, maybe it was 30—of your refugee determination, which made no sense at all. There was no check at the end of the process. It came immediately after your refugee claim. So the idea behind the PRRA of having a last check a year or two later, when the person is up for removal, in principle makes a lot of sense, but it all has to do with who carries it out, what their training is, what their independence is, and so on.