I'm going through the motion, and much of what you say certainly resonates with me. I saw a problem with item two of this motion, and perhaps we can receive some clarification.
As I understand it, the essence of the motion in item one talks about the government developing skills and competence-related criteria. Item two says that the government must submit this criteria to a standing committee for consideration, which is fine, with amendment if necessary. It talks about the approval of those criteria by this committee. Why is that particular phraseology there? Are we trying to say that in this resolution the criteria would have to be approved by the committee before it can be effected by the government?
If that's the case, I won't address it further, but perhaps somebody can address it. It seems to be an unusual kind of provision. The rest isn't unusual, but item two is, and it surprises me somewhat.